Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Kids with Depression: Pros and Cons

In this segments of our series, Understanding Depression in Kids and Teens…A Primer for Pastors, Church Staff and Christian Parents, we’ll look at the data on the non-pharmacologic treatment with the best supporting evidence in the treatment of children and teens with depression…Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy.

Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.  Romans 12:2 (NIV)

Along with medication, Cognitive-Behavioral therapy (CBT) represents one of the two primary, evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents with Major Depression.Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) also has supporting evidence for effectiveness in pediatric depression, but far less than CBT.

What exactly are we trying to do with kids through CBT? Kids who experience depression and/or anxiety are especially vulnerable to “thinking errors.” The kids I treat are prone to what one of our therapists refers to as “stinking thinking”…automatic, irrational thoughts pop into their heads in the course of day-to- day living that trigger negative emotions and lead to patterns of self-defeating behavior. These patterns of self-defeating behaviors often reinforce their cognitive misperceptions and lead to a downward spiral resulting in symptoms of anxiety, depression, and sometimes, suicidal thoughts or plans.

The job of the therapist is to help kids recognize the irrational thoughts and maladaptive patterns of behavior that contribute to negative emotions and help them to identify and implement alternative patterns of thinking and behavior in those situations when they’re most vulnerable to thinking errors. We’ll describe this to kids by telling them that we’re teaching them coping strategies or tools in order to give them the power to manage their emotions…helping them to develop a sense of competency.

One of the challenges in interpreting the data on CBT in kids involves the highly variable estimates of the effect size of the treatment (how much better do they get?) in kids with depression. This also points out the major functional limitation of a treatment plan for a child with depression that incorporates CBT-The child’s response is highly dependent upon the skill level and experience of the clinician providing the treatment.

We have a policy in our practice of not accepting referrals of kids who are involved in ongoing treatment with a clinician we don’t know. One reason I feel strongly about this is that I need to know what kids are getting if I’m being held responsible for their care. Not everybody who claims to be doing CBT with kids is actually providing a treatment that remotely resembles the therapy referenced in the article I linked to earlier in the post. While there’s a psychotherapeutic component to what I’m doing when I prescribe medication that (hopefully) contributes to the treatment effect, there’s less likely to be big difference in a kid’s response to Prozac based upon whether I’m the person writing the prescription as opposed to their pediatrician or nurse practitioner. After all, it’s all probably coming from the same jar at the CVS or Walgreen’s! The effectiveness of their CBT is highly dependent upon who’s doing the treatment. The lack of availability of well-trained clinicians in use of CBT with kids and teens creates enormous access problems for families.

Another functional limitation is the cost of CBT versus medication for kids with depression. In the two principal studies comparing CBT and medication in pediatric depression, kids received 12 sessions of CBT during the acute phase of treatment. A typical course of treatment for a kid with depression will involve around 20 visits with decreasing frequency over the course of a year. In our area, none of the three clinicians who I most frequently refer families to for CBT participate in insurance networks and their fee per session ranges from $125 to $140.

One way of looking at the treatment is that it still costs less than my kid’s orthodontist and provides them with skills that last a lifetime. On the other hand, at $4/month, a year’s supply of Prozac will can cost a family under $50, and the copays for 4-6 follow up visits over the course of the year with their primary care physician or in-network psychiatrist may run from $100-$300. Given the state of the economy and the financial demands families are facing, cost all too often becomes the overriding consideration in treatment planning.

Finally, for many kids and families, the time required for effective CBT is a major impediment. Finding time to do CBT can be a big problem for teens when they’re “in-season” for their sport, or for kids in the performing arts when they’re preparing for a play or a recital. Between extracurricular activities and homework, it’s not uncommon for kids to tell me that the stress involved with blocking out time to come to therapy outweighs the benefits.

Bottom line…I encourage families to consider CBT before medication for their child or teen with depression when…

  • Their child’s symptoms of depression are less severe.
  • When their child’s mood state appears highly dependent upon their misperceptions and irrational patterns of thinking and behavior.
  • A significant risk exists that antidepressant medication will exacerbate some other comorbid mental health condition or suicidal/self-injurious behavior. 

Dr. Steve Grcevich is a physician specializing in child and adolescent psychiatry who serves as President and Founder of Key Ministry. He blogs at church4everychild.org and may be reached at steve@keyministry.org.

 

Loading controls...
© 2024 iDisciple. All Rights Reserved.